An Easy Choice? WordPress and ExpressionEngine Compared
In a world full of multiple options, picking the right CMS can be quite a task at times. Each CMS comes with its own share of good and bad points, thus making the selection process even more difficult. How does one pick the ideal CMS? Which features does one require? These are only some of the questions that every user asks before he or she decides to use a particular CMS.
Two of the most talked-about CMSs in the current computing scenario are WordPress and ExpressionEngine. Each has its own loyal user base, multitudes of extensions and features, as well as drawbacks. Both WP and EE are often compared, debated and discussed all across the internet.
So, among WordPress and ExpressionEngine, which one beats the other? We shall attempt to answer this question in this article.
However, before we go any further with the actual comparison, let me first take a moment to clarify my reasoning behind each category or sub-category of comparison.
ExpressionEngine, on the other hand, assumes that you know what you’re doing (allow me to be blunt: if someone is shelling out over $200 for a single-license of a CMS, he or she should know the software well anyway). The CMS gives you channels, and each channel is given its own categories, custom fields and behavior. Thus, EE is not the CMS for your everyday blog or hobby site about osteopathy. In fact, EE is the option you should consider if your website is in need of multiple modules and features which are otherwise semi-hidden (or absent) in WordPress. In terms of user experience, ExpressionEngine will make your life very easy if you know how to treat it properly.
This is one area where ExpressionEngine lags slightly behind. That said, it must be clarified that EE has its own loyal user base and a decent community. However, in terms of numbers, the community is less populated as compared to that of WP. Furthermore, you will not be able to find many blogs related solely to EE. Perhaps the biggest reason for the smaller community is the fact that EE is a paid software, as compared to the totally free WP. Lastly, before you fall prey to the numbers’ game, it must also be pointed out that some of the biggest names in the industry use and trust EE, so just in case you decide to use it simply for the sake of good company, you won't be a loner!
WordPress and ExpressionEngine: The Comparison
What And How?
In writing this article, I have attempted to compare the two wonderful CMSs under the following heads:- Usability and User Experience
- Community and User Base
- Support and Documentation
- Miscellaneous
1. Usability and User Experience
Let’s take up WordPress first. Is the CMS usable? Definitely yes. However, what sort of user experience does it provide? Ideally speaking, usability need not simply refer to the interface and appearance, though a good interface is almost always a preliminary requirement. WordPress brings to its users a great level of simplification and abstraction: no matter where and what I write about WP, this is one point I often find myself repeating: WordPress deserves a pat on its back for bringing simplicity to the end users’ lives. Agreed, I am openly biased in favor of something light-weight such as Habari or something more refined, such as Concrete5. However, the abstraction that WordPress offers is in a league of its own! Yet, what about the advanced users? What if you wish to migrate domains or change the URL of your blog? What if you ‘like’ tweaking the database? In its crude form (sans plugins and extensions), can WP serve your purpose in that case? This is where the simplification of WordPress acts against it: Concrete5 gives me a sitemap editor and SEO settings without installing any plugins or playing around with the code; WordPress does not.
ExpressionEngine, on the other hand, assumes that you know what you’re doing (allow me to be blunt: if someone is shelling out over $200 for a single-license of a CMS, he or she should know the software well anyway). The CMS gives you channels, and each channel is given its own categories, custom fields and behavior. Thus, EE is not the CMS for your everyday blog or hobby site about osteopathy. In fact, EE is the option you should consider if your website is in need of multiple modules and features which are otherwise semi-hidden (or absent) in WordPress. In terms of user experience, ExpressionEngine will make your life very easy if you know how to treat it properly.
2. Community and User Base
WordPress is the world’s most popular CMS -- make no mistake about it, this piece of software has its own loyal following. You have the official forum, along with the plethora of websites all across the internet that offer your content related to WordPress. Basically, if you are looking for fellow WP users to share some knowledge and a cup of coffee, you will not have to look long and hard: there are just too many of them out there!
This is one area where ExpressionEngine lags slightly behind. That said, it must be clarified that EE has its own loyal user base and a decent community. However, in terms of numbers, the community is less populated as compared to that of WP. Furthermore, you will not be able to find many blogs related solely to EE. Perhaps the biggest reason for the smaller community is the fact that EE is a paid software, as compared to the totally free WP. Lastly, before you fall prey to the numbers’ game, it must also be pointed out that some of the biggest names in the industry use and trust EE, so just in case you decide to use it simply for the sake of good company, you won't be a loner!
@Steven Grant
WP is worse than Joomla or Drupal for identifying plugins used, themes used and of course the CMS from the source code – by several orders of magnitude. By using WP as a platform your site has essentially become an online advertising billboard. I recently used a well known theme framework that had no less than 200 references to the name of the framework used in the source code of just one page.
I am really happy found CMS like EE cause. I searching something same for my projects, and finally i got it.
Thanks for the article, nice website disighn!
As a designer who has absolutely no desire to become a PHP programmer, I use EE and occasionally Textpattern. I tried WordPress and really wanted to like it, but there is only so much that can be done with it in regards to customization before you are forced into learning PHP.
For us the two play in different leagues. WordPress, or our current favourite Concrete5, are great for low budget, simple sites. When we’re working on a £5k+ project it’s EE all the way.
Well….every discussion about “EE” that is out there, for which comments are still allowed, is (no offense) one web designer arguing with another about what a great “end user” experience this CMS or that CMS provides, or the ubiquitous, “EE isn’t free” argument. Well, let me tell you: there’s nothing friendly or fun or competitive about EE from the standpoint of the company STUCK, and yes, I mean, STUCK, using it. Have a WP or Joomla or Drupal or even EZPublish site and need someone to tweak it for you? You can find hundreds of web guys/gals to work on it, AFFORDABLY. Need someone for EE? You’re SCREWED. You can’t find anyone affordable, and it’s too brain-damaging to do it yourself. Need anything other than basic blog functionality? Oh, wait! There’s a module or plug-in that you have to buy in order to do that. I wrote our own first site using Boyink’s tutorial, from scratch. When I needed to have it updated, I was looking at a $5-$6K bill, just to get someone to even TALK to me. It would have been 20% of the price with WP, Joomla, etc. The EE guys think that EE is “the best ever” because, quite bluntly, they can charge ignorant company clients for a “custom” website using the same base templates that they coded over and over, and for which they simply change the outer “skin” or design. For a one-off site, what’s the benefit, as the whole thing requires custom code? It’s ridiculous. Worse, I cannot *believe* that EE guys will argue that WPress is not a “CMS,” because, bygod, EE certainly isn’t either. It’s a framework upon which you can build a CMS, from SCRATCH, with all custom code. The wiki is worthless, it has no templates at all (nothing you’d want, anyway), the forum is rusty at best, it *still* doesn’t even have a rudimentary gallery module, you can’t multi-link posts, and the table structure is clunky. Everything you need to make a full-featured, robust site at an enterprise level is owned/developed by SOMEONE ELSE, so if one of those companies goes out of business, you’re hosed.
I can’t use WPress, simply because the tables I need are far to large, and WP would bog down, but EE is no damn bargain. And for those of you complaining that it costs money–so what? You all pass it on to the poor schmucks like ME who have to pay for it, anyway. In my opinion, I wish I had bit the bullet and spent more–even a LOT more–for something with more REAL power–not imaginary power, or made-up-by-add-ins-power–that at least had a decent website designer/maintenance base from which to choose, without taking it up the strata chocolata. I tell any company owner who asks not to EVER allow a web designer to use EE, because that’s a web designer’s way of locking you into their services for EVER, no matter how bad or late or lazy their work IS. The moment I can afford it, I’m going to find another CMS (a real one) to use for our business, because EE is nothing but aggravation. Their corporate philosophy has no basis in customer service, particularly in 2013, and they don’t care two damns for the people who are ACTUALLY paying for those licenses: the business OWNERS, not the web developers who make the sites. $300 is nothing; it’s the thousands you’ll spend to get the site done, and the thousands more you’ll spend every time you need to refresh it, that’s expensive; that and the exceedingly limited labor pool from which to find people to work on the site. I’ve lost track of the “EE designers” who’ve told me that they’ve all moved on to other CMS’s. The labor pool is minute and very, very “proud” of their services, a great deal of which is utterly unwarranted. Ever looked at the “Site Gallery” on the EE homesite? You think sites like those are worth THOUSANDS? Most of them look like the same 3 predigested sites, regurgitated over and over.
I’m sure that there are still some business owners out there that are not savvy enough to look into what CMS is being used, but I for one make an effort to ensure that if anyone asks me what I think about ours, I tell them–run, do not walk, from getting “sold” on EE. For the business owner, it’s no bargain.
This is exactly what I was thinking whilst reading this article. It’s unfortunate for the client having to track down an EE developer. Sorry to hear that’s what you’ve had to deal with. This article does seem biased in favour of IE not wanting to start a he said/she said flame war over which CMS is better.
I’ve hired out for EE extensively and have not had issues like this. Sounds like your approach to hiring is entirely wrong. Instead of searching specifically for an “EE developer”, simply find a reasonably priced developer that you like and hire them to do an EE job for you. They will pick it up quickly and everything will turn out fine (assuming that finding and hiring good freelancers is something you are good at).
This really is the most bizarre rant to be perfectly honest with you.
“I tell any company owner who asks not to EVER allow a web designer to use EE, because that’s a web designer’s way of locking you into their services for EVER”
Maybe the obviously wacky web designer you are using. Any developer with even the most basic understanding of a web-based scripting language such as PHP, PERL or Ruby could pick up EE in a few days. I guarantee you I would be able to fix your EE woes, no matter what they are, for a very reasonable rate and in super-quick time. The thing is, I would never work with you because you obviously like to paint people with the same brush based on your own crappy experiences.
You obviously know NOTHING about EE and have had a terrible experience finding people who can help you. I would suggest you calm down and take the time to find a good developer who can help you with an EE problem rather than looking for an “EE developer”
“it’s the thousands you’ll spend to get the site done, and the thousands more you’ll spend every time you need to refresh it, that’s expensive; ” – some business owner you are. Jeez.
thanks, you opened my eyes.
I was asked by a company to fix another developers mess up on Friday and it had to be ready today. The changes included Content Updating, Fixing the Menu Structure and styling CSS. Tasks that would normally take me an hour on WordPress. This same task took me three days of trying to find my way around this complicated web of channels and what not! Isn’t the purpose of a CMS to ensure that there is ease of use?
And i am sorry, I have not once come across a situation where i have not been able to make WordPress or even joomla work the way i need it to with a bit of code. So this story of EE is better because it is more customizable is rubbish.
I have been developing for 6 years and did study this so i do know a bit of what I am talking about.
What is even more frustrating is that they actually charge for this? People as the title says it is a very easy choice do not even attempt this “CMS”
@Company Owner and @Wayne Spence
It seems rather silly to criticize software simply because YOU don’t know how to use it. Your personal ignorance of, or thoughts on how EE should be more like it’s competitors is short-sighted, and really doesn’t encourage diversity or competition.
If you prefer WP, stick with it. It’s a good CMS for certain cases. If you use EE, then LEARN how to use it. It’s a different approach. If you do, you may reconsider your opinions.
To address not having affordable EE devs — there are plenty, very skilled and affordable EE devs. Perhaps you have little choice in your local area, but the joys of the Internet mean that geography presents few boundaries anymore. I myself am very affordable, but I wouldn’t even wish to try and contact you (@Company Owner) based on how you represented yourself above.
As a final note, when it comes to the actual security of your website, EE so far wins hands down. No major security issues it’s over decade history, something WP can never claim.
EE is definitely the most simple. Saying it lacks flexibility is simply not true :) you can do most things easily or a plugin exists for free already. There’s definitely a learning curve for making plugins though. To me, that curve is making an options page.
Drupal is way less convenient and quick.
And expressions engine is less intuitive.
From a standpoint where you think of the client and their usability needs, wordpress works well. You can hide menu items that they don’t need too so that it’s more streamlined.
Your conclusion “WordPress lets you install themes at will; why can’t ExpressionEngine do that?” makes me think you have missed the entire point of EE. There is a reason that so many of EE built websites are absolutely stunning to look at and that it is the most popular CMS among design agencies. The EE template system is designed to allow data to be integrated perfectly into any design. A templating system that allows one template to swapped with another on the fly is certainly convenient, but this can’t be accomplished without some abstraction of how the templates are integrated with the scripts and database. EE is the CMS that is used for 10k custom designs, it is not for swapping $30 themes on the fly.
I offer both WordPress and ExpressionEngine to my clients. Most of my clients are small business owners on a budget and with the purchase of a professional WP theme, most clients get along just fine.
However, my personal choice is EE. As I’ve worked with both WP and EE, I’ve found that as a non-programmer, I can manipulate and practically do anything I want with a website using EE. The coding language, custom fields and channels give me the power and flexibility I need to build out a website how I want it. I also believe that the add-ons that are available are handled with more care than in the WP community. Also the out of the box features can’t be beat for the low one-time $300 license fee.
In WP I have to figure out PHP (I’m getting better at it) in the templates and try to tweak it. Its usually a few hours of research to figure out what I broke in a theme. Also, most themes are limiting in some way and again require extensive PHP knowledge to figure out how to change.
There is more to say but not enough time to dive in more deeply.